Volume 2, Issue 2 (IJHMD 2025)                   IJHMD 2025, 2(2): 13-17 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Charkazi A. Public health students’ satisfaction and perceptions of a learning trip on rabies prevention, cutaneous leishmaniasis, and serological tests of brucellosis. IJHMD 2025; 2 (2) :13-17
URL: http://jhd.goums.ac.ir/article-1-43-en.html
Educational Development Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , rcharkazi@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 430 kb]   (349 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1461 Views)
Full-Text:   (50 Views)
Introduction
The prevention and control of common and regionally endemic diseases form a core component of primary healthcare services. Although major strides have been made in reducing the burden of communicable diseases, the planning and delivery of disease-specific prevention and treatment strategies-adapted to local geographic and epidemiological conditions-remain essential responsibilities of national health systems (1). Public health, as a key discipline within the health sciences, plays an important role in preparing graduates who understand the needs of individuals, families, and communities. These professionals are expected to assess health-threatening factors in the environment and implement appropriate interventions to improve population health (2). In Iran, where health services are provided through an integrated network, public health graduates must acquire the knowledge and competencies necessary to work effectively within this system (3).
Training in communicable disease control is therefore fundamental. Students must become familiar with practical approaches for preventing, managing, and eliminating infectious diseases so that they can perform their responsibilities in accordance with the guidelines of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (4). However, traditional lecture-based teaching alone is often insufficient for achieving the learning outcomes of this course. More interactive and applied instructional methods are needed. Community-based learning has been recognized as one such method, offering deeper and more lasting learning compared with conventional instruction. By engaging directly with real public health environments, students develop greater interest, better understanding of community health challenges, and stronger problem-solving and critical-thinking skills (5-7). Constructivist educational theory also emphasizes the value of authentic learning activities-tasks that mirror real-life situations rather than abstract classroom exercises (8).
Within Iran’s medical education reforms, the justice-oriented and responsive training package aims to align academic curricula with community needs and emerging health challenges. This initiative encourages the development of educational programs that enhance students’ motivation, foster social accountability, and improve the capacity of the healthcare workforce (9).
Golestan Province experiences several endemic diseases of public health importance. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and some cases of visceral leishmaniasis have long been reported in areas around Maraveh Tappeh and Gonbad-e-Kavous (10). Rabies continues to pose a significant threat, with an estimated 2-6 human deaths annually in Iran and an incidence rate of 13.2 per 1,000 population based on two decades of data (11). In Kalaleh, Golestan Province, the incidence reached 654 per 100,000 population between 2016 and 2020 (12). Brucellosis, another endemic zoonotic disease, remains widespread due to factors such as nomadic populations, traditional livestock practices, and insufficient vaccination coverage. Iran reports approximately 16,000 human cases each year, making it one of the countries with the highest brucellosis burden (13-15).
In previous years, the national infectious disease control course for public health students was delivered exclusively through classroom lectures. To enhance learning outcomes, instructors redesigned the curriculum to include visits to operational units in healthcare centers. Accordingly, practical sessions involving visits to relevant departments in the Gonbad-e-Kavous healthcare network were implemented as part of the course to support achievement of its educational objectives.

Methods
Study design and participants
This cross-sectional study was conducted among 97 undergraduate public health students-both continuous and discontinuous bachelor’s students-who were enrolled in the national infectious disease control course during the 2017-2018 and 2019-2020 academic years. In the Iranian medical education system, continuous students enter the bachelor’s program directly after high school, whereas discontinuous students first complete an associate degree and then pursue an additional two years of study to obtain a bachelor’s degree in public health. Many discontinuous students are employed within the health system and complete their studies on a part-time basis. All eligible students were included through a census approach.
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomes were defined to specify the competencies students were expected to achieve by the end of each departmental visit, as well as the observable behaviors demonstrating those competencies.
1. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) department: By the end of the visit, students were expected to:
- Identify criteria for selecting local or systemic treatment of CL lesions.
- Describe the procedure for sampling Leishman bodies from suspected wounds.
- Communicate effectively with patients to obtain epidemiological histories.
- Calculate appropriate systemic doses of Glucantime based on body weight.
- Record patient demographic and treatment information electronically.
- Observe Leishman bodies microscopically.
- Administer Glucantime through intramuscular and peri-lesional injections.
2. Rabies prevention department: Expected competencies included:
- Identifying eligibility criteria for post-exposure prophylaxis with anti-rabies vaccine and/or rabies immune globulin (RbIG).
- Describing correct techniques for washing and managing animal bite wounds.
- Calculating appropriate doses of RbIG.
- Explaining patient follow-up procedures to ensure completion of the prophylaxis regimen.
3. Brucellosis diagnostic department: Expected outcomes included the ability to:
- Describe serological tests used for diagnosing Brucellosis.
- Interpret Wright, Coombs Wright, and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME) tests.
- Identify and interpret serum dilutions and micro-agglutination reactions.
Measures
Data were collected using a questionnaire designed to assess the extent to which educational objectives were achieved. The instrument consisted of 23 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (From strongly disagree to strongly agree), including nine items related to the CL unit, nine items on the rabies prevention unit, and five items on the Brucellosis serology laboratory. After completing the site visits, students rated each item on a scale of 1 to 7. The questionnaire was developed by the course instructor based on the course curriculum. Its content validity was reviewed and approved by three faculty members, and revisions were made based on their feedback. Reliability testing using Cronbach’s alpha yielded coefficients of 0.899 for the entire questionnaire, 0.843 for the CL section, 0.407 for the rabies section, and 0.841 for the Brucellosis section. In addition, one item assessed overall satisfaction with each department on a 0-100 scale, and another item measured overall satisfaction with the entire visit on the same scale. An open-ended question invited students to suggest additional diseases or clinical units they believed would be relevant to future visits.
Procedure
The instructor coordinated with the Gonbad-e-Kavous healthcare center to identify educational needs and secure the required approvals through the Vice-Chancellor for Education. Student visits were carried out between November 2017 and November 2019, with continuous and discontinuous bachelor’s students attending in alternating weeks. November was selected due to the seasonal peak of CL cases. Prior to the visits, students received theoretical instruction on CL, rabies, and Brucellosis. During the visits, students rotated through three departments:
- Leishmaniasis unit: Students observed cryotherapy procedures, intramuscular and local injections, wound sampling techniques, slide preparation and examination, and patient follow-up processes.
- Rabies prevention unit: Students learned wound-washing procedures, administration of vaccines and RbIG, safety protocols, documentation steps, and real-time patient management.
- Serology laboratory (Brucellosis): Students observed Wright’s tests, serum dilution procedures, and interpretation of positive samples.
In each department, all educational activities were delivered by the respective department head, ensuring consistency of instruction and reducing variation in students’ learning experiences. The visits included demonstrations, observational learning, and opportunities for questions and discussion. After completing the visits, students filled out anonymous questionnaires. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR.GOUMS.REC.1396.236).
Statistical analysis
Data from the completed questionnaires were entered into SPSS version 15 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and frequencies, were calculated. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare satisfaction scores between continuous and discontinuous bachelor’s students. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was applied to assess the relationship between students’ satisfaction scores and their grade point averages. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests.

Results
A total of 97 students completed the visits and participated in the study. Of these, 61 students (62.9%) were female, and 50 (51.5%) were enrolled in the discontinuous bachelor’s program. Students’ grade point averages ranged from 13.37 to 18.24, with a mean score of 15.91 ± 1.04. Overall, students expressed high levels of satisfaction with the educational value of visiting the three operational units. Most participants reported that the visits were informative and contributed meaningfully to achieving the course’s learning objectives (Table 1).
Similarly, most students reported that the visit to the rabies prevention and control department was highly educational and supported their achievement of the course learning objectives (Table 2).
In addition, most students indicated that observing Brucellosis serological procedures in the central laboratory was highly educational and contributed effectively to meeting the course’s learning objectives (Table 3).
The overall satisfaction score for the combined visit was 92.61 ± 11.87 on a 0-100 scale, indicating a very high level of approval among participants. Satisfaction scores for each individual department were also high and reflected a positive learning experience (Table 4).
Table 5 presents the mean and standard deviation of student satisfaction scores for the three departments, measured on a 7-point Likert scale. The Leishmaniasis unit received the highest satisfaction scores, while the Brucellosis laboratory received the lowest; however, the differences among the departments were relatively small, indicating generally high satisfaction across all sections.
A comparison of satisfaction scores between continuous and discontinuous bachelor’s students using independent samples t-tests indicated that discontinuous students reported significantly higher satisfaction with both the Brucellosis laboratory and the rabies prevention and control department compared to continuous students (Table 6).
Table 1. Frequency distribution of students’ views regarding the leishmaniasis unit visit


Table 2. Frequency distribution of students’ views regarding the rabies prevention unit visit


Table 3. Frequency distribution of the student’s view on brucellosis serology tests
Table 4. Students’ satisfaction percentages for the three departments in the healthcare center


Table 5. Mean ± SD of student satisfaction scores for each department


Table 6. Comparison of student satisfaction scores between continuous and discontinuous bachelor’s students*

*Differences between groups were analyzed using independent samples t-test. Significance level was set at 0.05
Pearson correlation analysis indicated no significant relationship between students’ overall satisfaction scores and their grade point averages (P > 0.05). Additionally, the majority of students expressed a preference for this type of experiential learning over other topics in the course, particularly citing tuberculosis as a case they would like to study in a similar hands-on format.

Discussion
This study evaluated the impact of visits to the operational departments of the Gonbad-e-Kavous healthcare center on public health students’ satisfaction with the achievement of course objectives. Overall, students reported high levels of satisfaction with this experiential learning approach, with the highest satisfaction observed in the Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) department. The high satisfaction in the CL department likely reflects the students’ opportunity to observe patients with various CL lesions and learn about treatment protocols, including local and systemic therapies and cryotherapy. Students were organized into small groups to examine different wounds and treatment procedures, observe sampling techniques, perform Giemsa staining, and identify Leishman bodies under the microscope. The combination of conventional classroom instruction with direct, hands-on observation provided a rich, immersive learning environment. This aligns with Edgar Dale’s Cone of Experience, which emphasizes that direct, first-hand experiences significantly enhance learning retention (16). Similar findings have been reported by Sathishkumar et al., who observed that early clinical exposure improved medical students’ understanding, memorization, and integration of physiological knowledge while fostering sensitivity toward patients (17). Likewise, Jefferson et al. found that field visits with Alzheimer’s patients positively influenced students’ attitudes and engagement with real-life patient care (18).
The rabies prevention and control department received the second-highest satisfaction ratings, comparable to the CL department. Some groups were not able to observe active patient care, which may have slightly limited the hands-on experience. Nevertheless, students learned wound care procedures, vaccination and rabies immune globulin administration, dosage calculation, and patient follow-up through observation and interactive discussions with department staff. According to educational research, approximately 75% of learning occurs through visual engagement, and experiences at the base of Dale’s cone can achieve up to 90% retention of knowledge (16). The combination of observation, demonstration, and Q&A likely contributed to the high satisfaction reported.
Satisfaction with the Brucellosis serology laboratory, while slightly lower than the other departments, remained high. This may have been influenced by student fatigue, as the laboratory visit occurred at the end of the day. Nonetheless, exposure to real patient serum samples, stepwise preparation of dilutions, and interpretation of Wright, Coombs Wright, and 2ME tests helped students understand laboratory procedures and diagnostic protocols. Similar results were observed in the study by Taylor and Mann, where genetic counselors’ clinical visits to a cancer center enhanced their understanding of patient care and increased their sense of responsibility and empathy (19).
Discontinuous bachelor’s students reported significantly higher satisfaction than continuous students in the Brucellosis laboratory and rabies prevention departments. This difference may reflect the prior theoretical exposure of discontinuous students, who had encountered these topics in earlier courses but had not yet engaged with real-world applications. Interestingly, no significant correlation was observed between students’ GPA and satisfaction scores, indicating that the visits were equally engaging and beneficial for students across the academic performance spectrum.
This study has several limitations. Its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported questionnaires limit the ability to infer causal relationships. Only three departments were visited in a single day, which may restrict generalizability. The study focused on student satisfaction rather than direct assessment of learning outcomes, preventing comparisons with previous cohorts who did not participate in the visits. Ambiguity in Likert scale descriptors, such as “somewhat” and “slightly,” could have led to inconsistent interpretations by students. Regarding the questionnaire, while content validity was reviewed by three faculty experts, quantitative indices such as the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were not calculated, limiting objective evidence of item relevance. Additionally, the Cronbach’s alpha for the rabies prevention subscale was relatively low (0.407), likely due to the small number of items and topic diversity. Despite this, the subscale was retained because it captured key aspects of students’ satisfaction; however, findings related to this section should be interpreted with caution.
In summary, the findings support the value of community-based, experiential learning in public health education, demonstrating that direct engagement with operational healthcare departments enhances student satisfaction and reinforces understanding of real-world public health practices.

Conclusion
Students reported high satisfaction with this experiential learning approach, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing engagement and understanding of public health practices. Extending similar field visits and scientific trips to other public health courses is recommended, particularly after addressing time constraints during visits. Given the positive perceptions observed, future studies should evaluate the impact of such visits on actual learning outcomes using rigorous designs, such as pre-test/post-test assessments with control groups.

Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the Gonbad-e-Kavous health authorities for kindly providing access to the departments for the visits.

Funding sources
This study was funded by Golestan University of Medical Sciences.

Ethical statement
Formal ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR.GOUMS.REC.1396.236). All procedures were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the study.

Conflicts of interest
The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author contributions
All phases of the study were conducted by AC.

Data availability statement
The dataset is available upon request from the corresponding author.
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Clinical
Received: 2024/12/19 | Accepted: 2025/11/18 | Published: 2025/12/29

References
1. Raeisi A, Zahraei M, Sorosh NajafAbadi, Shirzadi M, Sedaghat A, Masoumi-Asl H, et al . Comprehensive guideline of communicable diseases surveillance system for family physician. Tehran: Andishmand; 2012. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
2. Shirjang A, Alizadeh M, Mortazavi F, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Jeddi A. Relevance of public health BSc curriculum to job requirements and health system expectations: Views of graduates on courses syllabi and content. IJME. 2013;12(10):768-77. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
3. Razmara Ferezghi H, Razmara Ferezghi M, Javadinia S. Health Sector Evolution and Medical Education Necessity of providing education supplement. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2016;12(5):e58529. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
4. Ministry of Health. Public Health BSc Curriculum.2016. [Available from: http://sph.umsha.ac.ir/index.aspx?fkeyid=&siteid=18&pageid=5220. [View at Publisher]
5. Öcek ZA, ÇiÇeklioğlu M, Gürsoy ŞT, Aksu F, Soyer MT, Hassoy H, et al. Public health education in Ege University Medical Faculty: developing a community-oriented model.Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):e180-e8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Khan I, Fareed A. Perceptions of students and faculty about conventional learning and community-oriented medical education. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003;13(2):82-5. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Klegeris A, Hurren H. Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(4):408-15. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Saif AA. Modern educational psychology. 6th ed. Tehran: Doran Publishing; 2009. p. 213‑8 [View at Publisher]
9. Malekpour Afshar R, Noori Hekmat S, Dehnavieh R, Balochi M. Transformational Packages in Medical Sciences Education; the Importance of Roadmap. SDME. 2019;16(1):e918340. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Jorjani O, Mirkarimi K, Charkazi A, Shahamat YD, Mehrbakhsh Z, Bagheri A. The epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Golestan Province, Iran: A cross-sectional study of 8-years. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2019:5:e00099. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Abedi M, Doosti-Irani A, Jahanbakhsh F, Sahebkar A. Epidemiology of animal bite in Iran during a 20-year period (1993-2013): a meta-analysis. Trop Med Health. 2019;47(1):55. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Zafarzadeh A, Toghdari M, Charkazi A. Epidemiology of Animal Bites in Kalaleh City, Iran. J Health Syst Res. 2025;21(1):48-53. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Norouzinezhad F, Erfani H, Norouzinejad A, Ghaffari F, Kaveh F. Epidemiological Characteristics and Trend in the Incidence of Human Brucellosis in Iran from 2009 to 2017. J Res Health Sci. 2021;21(4):e00535. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Babaie E, Alesheikh AA, Tabasi M. Spatial prediction of human brucellosis (HB) using a GIS-based adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Acta Tropica. 2021;220:105951. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Pordanjani SR, Mazaheri E, Farivar F, Babakhanian M, Askarpour H, Derakhshan S. Spatial Epidemiology and Temporal Trend of Brucellosis in Iran Using Geographic Information System (GIS) and Join Point Regression Analysis: An Ecological 10-Year Study. Iran J Public Health. 2024;53(6):1446-56. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Dale E. Audiovisual methods in teaching. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1969. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
17. Sathishkumar S, Thomas N, Tharion E, Neelakantan N, Vyas R. Attitude of medical students towards early clinical exposure in learning endocrine physiology. BMC Med Educ. 2007:7:30. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Jefferson AL, Cantwell NG, Byerly LK, Morhardt D. Medical student education program in Alzheimer's disease: The PAIRS Program. BMC Med Educ. 2012:12:80. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Taylor J, Mann KJ. Observation of the cancer patient journey: a learning curve for Genetic Counsellors. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 2012;10(Suppl 2):A51. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal Of Healthcare Management And Development

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb